June 16, 2007

Graduate Segregation

At UCLA, graduation was difficult to schedule this spring. Whats interesting about this school is their extensive amount of separate "identity-group" graduation ceremonies, the challenge able being to schedule them all at non-conflicting times with one another.

"The women’s studies graduation and the Chicana/Chicano studies graduation are both set for 10 AM Saturday. The broader Hispanic graduation, “Raza,” is in near-conflict with the black graduation, which starts just an hour later...Students of Asian heritage were once content with the Asian–Pacific Islanders ceremony. But now there are separate Filipino and Vietnamese commencements, and some talk of a Cambodian one in the future." -City Journal

And the list goes on.

What I don't understand is this idea of self-segregation, as if it makes a difference what the color the person is next to you...or for that matter, what their sexual orientation might be. UCLA also has the Lavender Graduation Ceremony for students who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered. The event warrants a rainbow-colored tassel. Many students actually qualify for multiple graduations, and get to choose which aspect of themselves they wish to celebrate.

Yes, at a school of this size the main graduation ceremony can become quite large and impersonal. The answer, however, is not separating our students into groups based on birth-given characteristics. All we can see at UCLA is that segregation is still a growing force, only now it is self motivated. We all have one common identity through education, and it should be that identity that is prevalent at commencement.

posted by Carl Soderberg at 10:13 AM

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

My school does something similar, but everyone has the choice of attending the main graduation. Still, I also dont understand why we have to separate, even if it is voluntary. If that were the case, then why not have a caucasian ceremony if we choose to? I dont see the difference, but I know others will try to explain one. Its just a way of creating another barrier between one another in society...minorities are just as capable of putting them up as the majority was in the past.

June 17, 2007 10:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Headlines

  • Brr! Where did Global Warming Go?
  • Clinton and Obama locked in New Hampshire
  • Bhutto's Party to seek probe into her death
  • Supreme Court to re-examine Capital Punishment by Lethal Injection
  • Huckabee's Tax Plan raises eyebrows
      • Support RFAR!

    News & Opinion

    • BlackFive.net
    • Blogs of War
    • Pat Buchanan
    • Ann Coulter
    • CNN
    • Cox & Forkum
    • Drudge Report
    • Fox News
    • Google News
    • Hot Air
    • Instapundit
    • John Cox Art
    • Little Green Football's
    • Michelle Malkin
    • WSJ Opinion Journal
    • Politico
    • Real Clear Politics
    • Red State
    • Townhall
    • Weekly Standard

    Previous Posts

    • Denver's New "Green" Plan
    • Massachusetts Bans Vote on Gay Marriage
    • County to Canel Hurricane Warning Program with Loc...
    • UPDATE: Haven for Illegals
    • New Haven, CT: Haven for Illegals
    • Iran Caught Red-Handed
    • NASA Chief Backs Off...
    • Charges Dropped Against Terror Detainees
    • Hugo Silences the People
    • Sheehan Gives it Up

      Translate RFAR Into:

      Subscribe to
      Posts [Atom]