February 20, 2007

A Win with Guantanamo Bay

The District of Columbia Circuit Appeals Court ruled 2-1 that civilian courts could no longer rule of whether or not the military is legally holding foreign suspects. This is a huge victory for the current administration and their Military Commissions Act, which was pushed through last year to set up a system to prosecute terror suspects. Keeping detainees out of the US Court system was a major aspect of the act.

Although this will more than likely be appealed to the Supreme Court, it should stand up to their votes as well. It was the Supreme Court that struck down the last plan for prosecuting terror suspects, prompting the creation of the Military Commissions Act.

What needs to be realized here is that those who are detained for terrorist acts against any facet of society is not entitled to the same rights US citizens are granted under the constitution. Once we get into the international arena, the responsibility of dealing with terrorists falls onto the military.

I'm sorry, but I am not going to grant the same rights we are promised as US citizens to the hijackers of 9/11 and their counterparts.

posted by Carl Soderberg at 5:03 PM

3 Comments:

Blogger Patrick said...

The problem becomes that you will not grant those rights to anyone who might be a hijacker or one of their cohorts as well.
Going down this road, eventually, an American citizen buying a knockoff watch from a street merchant in Jakarta (who happens to be an Al-Qaeda suspect) is suddenly determined to be an 'enemy combatant' and seized and imprisoned.
Sounds pretty far fetched doesn't it. It's not. If you take away recourse to oversight, suddenly all sorts of abuses will start to turn up.
Don't expect to convince you, but it is food for thought.

February 20, 2007 5:05 PM  
Anonymous Ray said...

Great thoughts Carl. Regarding the comment here, I'm not going to Jakarta or buying fake watches or anything else from somone I don't know on the "street". Give me a break, US citizens who obey the law have nothing to worry about. As far as I'm concerned, let the NSA or whoever wants too- listen to my phone calls especially if it helps save American lives in the future.

February 21, 2007 4:55 PM  
Anonymous Jason said...

"As far as I'm concerned, let the NSA or whoever wants too- listen to my phone calls especially if it helps save American lives in the future."


whatever happened to privacy and rights?

February 21, 2007 4:58 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Headlines

  • Brr! Where did Global Warming Go?
  • Clinton and Obama locked in New Hampshire
  • Bhutto's Party to seek probe into her death
  • Supreme Court to re-examine Capital Punishment by Lethal Injection
  • Huckabee's Tax Plan raises eyebrows
      • Support RFAR!

    News & Opinion

    • BlackFive.net
    • Blogs of War
    • Pat Buchanan
    • Ann Coulter
    • CNN
    • Cox & Forkum
    • Drudge Report
    • Fox News
    • Google News
    • Hot Air
    • Instapundit
    • John Cox Art
    • Little Green Football's
    • Michelle Malkin
    • WSJ Opinion Journal
    • Politico
    • Real Clear Politics
    • Red State
    • Townhall
    • Weekly Standard

    Previous Posts

    • "Piss on the Troop's Head's and tell them its Rain...
    • Lack of Support
    • Yes, Cut the Funding for our Protectors...Great Id...
    • Poor Argument
    • Iran: Stop it, or you are Next
    • C.W. Post RA's Fired
    • Did you Know?
    • Snickers Bars Controversy?
    • Senate Democrats: Put up or Shut up
    • Bill Arkin Rants makes NBC and the Washington Post...

      Translate RFAR Into:

      Subscribe to
      Posts [Atom]